In R (Jewish Rights Watch) v Leicester City Council (2016) EWHC 1512 (Admin) a Divisional Court stated that, while it is clear that a public authority must comply with the PSED, this obligation is more easily applied to a formal and developed policy than it is to resolutions of a local council following debate. The PSED obligations apply primarily, if not exclusively, to those involved in the process of framing and implementing policy (the Executive, in constitutional terms) rather than those who debate broad issues which may result in policies subsequently drafted and framed in accordance with the law. The PSED did not apply to a non-binding resolution. Nor, for similar reasons, was Section 17 of the Local Government Act 1988 engaged when the resolution was about public works contracts that were an executive responsibility.
Subscribe
Get an email when we publish a new post on this blog. We’ll never share your email and you can unsubscribe any time. Our use of your details is explained in our privacy policy.
"*" indicates required fields
Headings
- Best Value (13)
- Capital Finance and Companies (55)
- Council Tax and Rates (77)
- Decision making and Contracts (271)
- Elections and Bylaws (33)
- Environment, Highways and Leisure (120)
- General (17)
- Housing (151)
- Human Rights and Public Sector Equality Duty (105)
- Judicial Control, Liability and Litigation (223)
- Land, Goods and Services (73)
- Local Authority Powers (75)
- Non Judicial Control (21)
- Planning and Environmental (161)
- Social Care (79)
- Standards (24)
Disclaimer
This blog is maintained for information purposes only. It is not intended to be a source of legal advice and must not be relied upon as such. Blog posts reflect the views and opinions of their individual authors, not of chambers as a whole.
11KBW, 11 King’s Bench Walk, Temple, London EC4Y 7EQ | Tel: 020 7632 8500
Privacy | Terms & Conditions | © 11KBW 2025
Privacy | Terms & Conditions | © 11KBW 2025