In Trustees of the Barker Mill Estates v Test Valley Borough Council (2016) EWHC 3028 (Admin) Holgate J has said that the Judgment in Wychavon District Council v SoS for CLG (2016) EWHC 592 (Admin) had been wrongly decided. That had stated that the NPPF contained a general presumption in favour of sustainable development. However, said Holgate J, the only presumption in favour of sustainable development was, as stated in Cheshire East Borough Council v SoS for CLG (2016) EWHC 571 (Admin), that within the scope of paragraph 14 of the NPPF, which requires that Local Plans should meet “objectively assessed needs” unless either “… any adverse impacts of doing so would significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits, when assessed against the policies in the Framework taken as a whole; or specific policies in this Framework indicate development should be restricted”.
Subscribe
Get an email when we publish a new post on this blog. We'll never share your email and you can unsubscribe any time. Our use of your details is explained in our privacy policy.
Headings
- Best Value (13)
- Capital Finance and Companies (54)
- Council Tax and Rates (72)
- Decision making and Contracts (259)
- Elections and Bylaws (32)
- Environment, Highways and Leisure (117)
- General (17)
- Housing (143)
- Human Rights and Public Sector Equality Duty (103)
- Judicial Control, Liability and Litigation (212)
- Land, Goods and Services (72)
- Local Authority Powers (73)
- Non Judicial Control (21)
- Planning and Environmental (147)
- Social Care (72)
- Standards (22)
Disclaimer
This blog is maintained for information purposes only. It is not intended to be a source of legal advice and must not be relied upon as such. Blog posts reflect the views and opinions of their individual authors, not of chambers as a whole.
Comments are closed.
11KBW, 11 King’s Bench Walk, Temple, London EC4Y 7EQ | Tel: 020 7632 8500
Privacy | Terms & Conditions | © 11KBW 2024
Privacy | Terms & Conditions | © 11KBW 2024