In AI Properties ( Sunderland ) Ltd v Tudor Studios ( 2024 ) UKSC 27, concerned with the consequence of failure to comply with a statutory requirement to serve a notice, the Supreme Court says that, where there is no express statement of the consequences of non-compliance, the correct approach is to consider the whole of the structure within which the requirement arises, and ask what consequences of non-compliance best fits the structure as a whole. In each case, the focus is on (1) the purpose served served by the requirement, as assessed in the light of a detailed analysis of the particular statute, and (2) the specific facts of the case, having regard to whether any and what prejudice might be caused or whether any injustice might arise if the validity of the statutory process is affirmed notwithstanding the breach of the procedural requirements.
Subscribe
Get an email when we publish a new post on this blog. We'll never share your email and you can unsubscribe any time. Our use of your details is explained in our privacy policy.
Headings
- Best Value (13)
- Capital Finance and Companies (54)
- Council Tax and Rates (73)
- Decision making and Contracts (260)
- Elections and Bylaws (32)
- Environment, Highways and Leisure (117)
- General (17)
- Housing (143)
- Human Rights and Public Sector Equality Duty (104)
- Judicial Control, Liability and Litigation (212)
- Land, Goods and Services (72)
- Local Authority Powers (73)
- Non Judicial Control (21)
- Planning and Environmental (150)
- Social Care (73)
- Standards (22)
Disclaimer
This blog is maintained for information purposes only. It is not intended to be a source of legal advice and must not be relied upon as such. Blog posts reflect the views and opinions of their individual authors, not of chambers as a whole.
Comments are closed.
11KBW, 11 King’s Bench Walk, Temple, London EC4Y 7EQ | Tel: 020 7632 8500
Privacy | Terms & Conditions | © 11KBW 2024
Privacy | Terms & Conditions | © 11KBW 2024