The Liquidator of a tenant company has disclaimed the lease. The property is unoccupied. Who then is the “owner” of the property for the purposes of non-domestic rates? Answer: the landlord. So ruled Hickinbottom J in Schroder v Birmingham City Council [2014] EWHC 2207 (Admin). The disclaimer determined the lease. It gave the landlord the right to immediate possession. It was irrelevant that the Insolvency Act 1986 preserved the contractual liabilities of the guarantor. Those did not mean that the guarantor had a right to immediate possession.
Subscribe
Get an email when we publish a new post on this blog. We'll never share your email and you can unsubscribe any time. Our use of your details is explained in our privacy policy.
Headings
- Best Value (13)
- Capital Finance and Companies (54)
- Council Tax and Rates (73)
- Decision making and Contracts (260)
- Elections and Bylaws (32)
- Environment, Highways and Leisure (117)
- General (17)
- Housing (143)
- Human Rights and Public Sector Equality Duty (104)
- Judicial Control, Liability and Litigation (212)
- Land, Goods and Services (72)
- Local Authority Powers (73)
- Non Judicial Control (21)
- Planning and Environmental (150)
- Social Care (73)
- Standards (22)
Disclaimer
This blog is maintained for information purposes only. It is not intended to be a source of legal advice and must not be relied upon as such. Blog posts reflect the views and opinions of their individual authors, not of chambers as a whole.
Comments are closed.
11KBW, 11 King’s Bench Walk, Temple, London EC4Y 7EQ | Tel: 020 7632 8500
Privacy | Terms & Conditions | © 11KBW 2024
Privacy | Terms & Conditions | © 11KBW 2024