Friends of the Earth v Secretary of State ( 2024 ) EWHC 995 ( Admin ) concerns the process to achieve net zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050 and carbon budgets. Clive Sheldon J says at para 117 that there is no free-standing obligation in public law that information about risk is to presented in a particular way. How the risk is presented to the decision-maker can be impugned only if the content of what is provided does not enable a statutory evaluation exercise to be carried out lawfully. At para 127 he says that Wednesbury unreasonableness may be made out when there is an unexplained evidential gap or leap in reasoning which fails to justify the conclusion reached by the decision-maker.
Subscribe
Get an email when we publish a new post on this blog. We'll never share your email and you can unsubscribe any time. Our use of your details is explained in our privacy policy.
Headings
- Best Value (13)
- Capital Finance and Companies (54)
- Council Tax and Rates (73)
- Decision making and Contracts (260)
- Elections and Bylaws (32)
- Environment, Highways and Leisure (117)
- General (17)
- Housing (143)
- Human Rights and Public Sector Equality Duty (104)
- Judicial Control, Liability and Litigation (212)
- Land, Goods and Services (72)
- Local Authority Powers (73)
- Non Judicial Control (21)
- Planning and Environmental (150)
- Social Care (73)
- Standards (22)
Disclaimer
This blog is maintained for information purposes only. It is not intended to be a source of legal advice and must not be relied upon as such. Blog posts reflect the views and opinions of their individual authors, not of chambers as a whole.
Comments are closed.
11KBW, 11 King’s Bench Walk, Temple, London EC4Y 7EQ | Tel: 020 7632 8500
Privacy | Terms & Conditions | © 11KBW 2024
Privacy | Terms & Conditions | © 11KBW 2024