In PEVENSEY COASTAL DEFENCE LTD v ENVIRONMENT AGENCY ( 2024 ) EWHC 1435 ( TCC ) it is held that, on the proper construction of a 25 year PFI agreement, for the provision of services, for the delivery of sea defences, the service provider could, retrospectively, make a claim for ADDITIONAL COST that it had incurred, as a result of a material increase in the FREQUENCY OF STORM EVENTS in the second decade of the PFI agreement, compared with its first decade. The ability to budget for a dynamic situation was a central element of the PFI agreement.

This entry was posted on Thursday, July 4th, 2024 at 8:48 am and is filed under Decision making and Contracts. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Responses are currently closed, but you can trackback from your own site.