Public authorities and public sector professionals are prima facie subject to the same general principleas as private persons. In KHAMBA v HARROW LBC (2025) EWHC 2803 (KB) Foster J holds, at para 40, that when a local authority is exercising statutory functions under the Mental Health Act 1983 there is NO ASSUMPTION OF RESPONSIBILITY unless such a duty of care would be imposed under conventional principles of tort. Public authorities and public sector professionala are, in the same way as private individuals, generally not under any DUTY TO PREVENT the occurrence of harm to third parties. At para 55 she says that the mere foreseeability of harm is not a sufficient basis for a duty of care to arise.
Subscribe
Get an email when we publish a new post on this blog. We’ll never share your email and you can unsubscribe any time. Our use of your details is explained in our privacy policy.
"*" indicates required fields
Headings
- Best Value (13)
- Capital Finance and Companies (57)
- Council Tax and Rates (82)
- Decision making and Contracts (285)
- Elections and Bylaws (34)
- Environment, Highways and Leisure (127)
- General (17)
- Housing (160)
- Human Rights and Public Sector Equality Duty (116)
- Judicial Control, Liability and Litigation (238)
- Land, Goods and Services (81)
- Local Authority Powers (75)
- Non Judicial Control (21)
- Planning and Environmental (181)
- Social Care (83)
- Standards (24)
Disclaimer
This blog is maintained for information purposes only. It is not intended to be a source of legal advice and must not be relied upon as such. Blog posts reflect the views and opinions of their individual authors, not of chambers as a whole.
Comments are closed.
11KBW, 11 King’s Bench Walk, Temple, London EC4Y 7EQ | Tel: 020 7632 8500 | © 11KBW 2025