The approach to, and steps to be taken towards, the forfeiture of a valuable lease for breach of covenant, the purpose of proceedings under Section 168(4) of the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002, and the requirements for a Notice under Section 146 of the Law of Property Act 1925, are set out by Martin Rodger KC, Deputy Chamber President, in CALMAN v STACK HOUSE RESIDENTS ( OXTED ) LTD (2025) UKUT 342 (LC) at paras 5 and 42.
Subscribe
Get an email when we publish a new post on this blog. We’ll never share your email and you can unsubscribe any time. Our use of your details is explained in our privacy policy.
"*" indicates required fields
Headings
- Best Value (13)
- Capital Finance and Companies (57)
- Council Tax and Rates (82)
- Decision making and Contracts (285)
- Elections and Bylaws (34)
- Environment, Highways and Leisure (125)
- General (17)
- Housing (158)
- Human Rights and Public Sector Equality Duty (115)
- Judicial Control, Liability and Litigation (232)
- Land, Goods and Services (79)
- Local Authority Powers (75)
- Non Judicial Control (21)
- Planning and Environmental (176)
- Social Care (83)
- Standards (24)
Disclaimer
This blog is maintained for information purposes only. It is not intended to be a source of legal advice and must not be relied upon as such. Blog posts reflect the views and opinions of their individual authors, not of chambers as a whole.
Comments are closed.
11KBW, 11 King’s Bench Walk, Temple, London EC4Y 7EQ | Tel: 020 7632 8500 | © 11KBW 2025