In ROMAL CAPITAL v Peel L&P ( Ports ) Ltd (2025) EWHC 3016 ( Ch ), on damages for breach of contract, in which C alleged that, but for the breaches by D of its obligations in an agreement for lease, C would have had a very good chance of obtaining a valuable planning permission for a large redevelopment scheme at Liverpool Docks, see on ESTOPPEL para 218, on what would have happened in a COUNTERFACTUAL WORLD para 314, on LOSS OF A CHANCE paras 422-426, and on UNCERTAINTIES IN EVALUATION paras 579-584.
Subscribe
Get an email when we publish a new post on this blog. We’ll never share your email and you can unsubscribe any time. Our use of your details is explained in our privacy policy.
"*" indicates required fields
Headings
- Best Value (13)
- Capital Finance and Companies (58)
- Council Tax and Rates (82)
- Decision making and Contracts (287)
- Elections and Bylaws (34)
- Environment, Highways and Leisure (127)
- General (17)
- Housing (160)
- Human Rights and Public Sector Equality Duty (116)
- Judicial Control, Liability and Litigation (243)
- Land, Goods and Services (83)
- Local Authority Powers (75)
- Non Judicial Control (21)
- Planning and Environmental (187)
- Social Care (83)
- Standards (25)
Disclaimer
This blog is maintained for information purposes only. It is not intended to be a source of legal advice and must not be relied upon as such. Blog posts reflect the views and opinions of their individual authors, not of chambers as a whole.
11KBW, 11 King’s Bench Walk, Temple, London EC4Y 7EQ | Tel: 020 7632 8500 | © 11KBW 2025