A Community Protection Notice under Section 43 of the Anti-Social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014 may not be served on person A in respect of anti-social behaviour by person B, say a child, on account of A being in a position to, and expected to, exert control over B. So held by a Divisional Court in Staffordshire Moorlands District Council v Sanderson (2020) EWHC 962 (Admin). Andrews J said, at para 35, that Parliament has chosen not to attribute the anti-social behaviour of one person to another person even if that other person has some power of control unless the behaviour can be treated as if it were the behaviour of that other person. Hickinbottom LJ, at para 41, gave the examples of when the anti-social behaviour is encouraged or supported.
Subscribe
Get an email when we publish a new post on this blog. We’ll never share your email and you can unsubscribe any time. Our use of your details is explained in ourĀ privacy policy.
"*" indicates required fields
Headings
- Best Value (13)
- Capital Finance and Companies (54)
- Council Tax and Rates (74)
- Decision making and Contracts (264)
- Elections and Bylaws (33)
- Environment, Highways and Leisure (117)
- General (17)
- Housing (147)
- Human Rights and Public Sector Equality Duty (104)
- Judicial Control, Liability and Litigation (218)
- Land, Goods and Services (73)
- Local Authority Powers (74)
- Non Judicial Control (21)
- Planning and Environmental (153)
- Social Care (74)
- Standards (23)
Disclaimer
This blog is maintained for information purposes only. It is not intended to be a source of legal advice and must not be relied upon as such. Blog posts reflect the views and opinions of their individual authors, not of chambers as a whole.
Comments are closed.
11KBW, 11 King’s Bench Walk, Temple, London EC4Y 7EQ | Tel: 020 7632 8500
Privacy | Terms & Conditions | © 11KBW 2024
Privacy | Terms & Conditions | © 11KBW 2024