JUDICIAL REVIEW

November 20th, 2025 by James Goudie KC in Judicial Control, Liability and Litigation

The House of Lords Select Committee on the CONSTITUTION has, on 20 November 2025, published a Report, “ The rule of law: holding the line against tyranny and anarchy “, including, at paras 93-99, on Judicial Review.

 

CONTRACTUAL LIABILITY

November 18th, 2025 by James Goudie KC in Judicial Control, Liability and Litigation

In ROMAL CAPITAL v Peel L&P ( Ports ) Ltd (2025) EWHC 3016 ( Ch ), on damages for breach of contract, in which C alleged that, but for the breaches by D of its obligations in an agreement for lease, C would have had a very good chance of obtaining a valuable planning permission for a large redevelopment scheme at Liverpool Docks, see on ESTOPPEL para 218, on what would have happened in a COUNTERFACTUAL WORLD para 314, on LOSS OF A CHANCE paras 422-426, and on UNCERTAINTIES IN EVALUATION  paras 579-584.

 

LIABILITY

November 17th, 2025 by James Goudie KC in Judicial Control, Liability and Litigation

In R ( Coventry City Council ) v SSHD (2025) EWHC 2929 ( Admin ) the Council’s challenge on 6 grounds failed with respect to SSHD’s actions pursuant to the Immigration & Asylum Act 1999 in accommodation, an Ibis Hotel, in the Council’s area.

 

HARASSMENT

November 12th, 2025 by James Goudie KC in Judicial Control, Liability and Litigation

An interim injunction having been imposed in a claim for breach of the statutory tort of harassment does not have the effect that the Prohibition of Cross-Examination in Person Regulations, S.I. 2022/568, applies in respect of a subsequent trial : so held by Steyn J in OPTOSAFE LTD v ROBERTSON (2025) EWHC 2733 (KB).

 

SETTING ASIDE OF ORDER

November 11th, 2025 by James Goudie KC in Judicial Control, Liability and Litigation

When money is paid pursuant to an Order that is set aside, the payer is entitled to RESTITUTION of that amount, with INTEREST “ in suitable cases”.

 

LIABILITY FOR BREACH OF STATUTORY DUTY

November 11th, 2025 by James Goudie KC in Judicial Control, Liability and Litigation

In EDGE TELECOMMUNICATIONS V OFCOM (2025) EWHC 2758 (KB) Linden J reaffirms that most statutory duties in the public context are owed to the public at large.. In cases of legislation establishing an administrative system to promote social welfare, “ exceptionally clear statutory language “ is necessary to create any right to damages for breach of statutory duty.

 

NATURAL JUSTICE ? PROCEDURAL FAIRNESS

October 31st, 2025 by James Goudie KC in Judicial Control, Liability and Litigation

HART v WING-SAN CHIN (2025) UKPC 51 summarises at para 32 the law on when a person should receive NOTICE in advance of ADVERSE COMMENTS OR FINDINGS as a matter of natural justice and procedural fairness :

  1. The standards of fairness are not immutable;
  2. They are not to be applied identically in every situation;
  3. The requirements in any case depend, crucially, upon the particular facts and circumstances;
  4. Fairness will very often require that a person who may be ADVERSELY AFFECTED by the decision will have an OPPORTUNITY to make representations on his own behalf, either before the decision is taken, with a view to producing a favourable result, or, after it is taken, with a view to procuring its modification, or both;
  5. Fairness will often require that the person affected is INFORMED OF THE GIST of the case that he/she has to answer;
  6. The more finality there is in the conclusions reached by an inquiry and reflected in its report and the greater the strength of their expression, the more that is required to be done to ENSURE THAT THE PROCESS IS FAIR;

Breach of the requirement of fairness is a serious matter, even if it is devoid of practical consequences.

 

NEGLIGENCE

October 30th, 2025 by James Goudie KC in Judicial Control, Liability and Litigation

Public authorities and public sector professionals are prima facie subject to the same general principleas as private persons. In KHAMBA v HARROW LBC (2025) EWHC 2803 (KB) Foster J holds, at para 40, that when a local authority is exercising statutory functions under the Mental Health Act 1983 there is NO ASSUMPTION OF RESPONSIBILITY unless such a duty of care would be imposed under conventional principles of tort. Public authorities and public sector professionala are, in the same way as private individuals, generally not under any DUTY TO PREVENT the occurrence of harm to third parties. At para 55 she says that the mere foreseeability of harm is not a sufficient basis for a duty of care to arise.

 

TORTIOUS LIABILITY

October 29th, 2025 by James Goudie KC in Judicial Control, Liability and Litigation

On tortious liability, see MARPLES v SoS for EDUCATION (2025) EWHC 2794 (Ch) : (1) on misfeasance in public office, including targeted malice, at paras 158-177; and (2) on negligence, including assumption of responsibility and pure economic loss, at paras 178-210.

 

MISFEASANCE

October 28th, 2025 by James Goudie KC in Judicial Control, Liability and Litigation

The law on liability for the tort of misfeasance in PUBLIC OFFICE is set out at paras 181-186 inc in WILKINSON v HMRC (2025) EWHC 2773 (KB).