Co-operation

June 9th, 2020 by James Goudie KC in Decision making and Contracts

Two Districts and a Town in Germany entrust the disposal of their mixed municipal household waste to a special purpose association which they control together. The local authorities are of course “ contracting authorities” for the purposes of the public procurement regime. The association is a “body governed by public law”. It also is a “contracting authority” for the purposes of Directive 2014/24.

Read more »

 

Procurement Risks

June 9th, 2020 by James Goudie KC in Decision making and Contracts

MHCLG has published “ Review into the risks of fraud and corruption in local government procurement”. Pages 50-52 make a series of good practice recommendations.

 

Voter Identification

June 8th, 2020 by James Goudie KC in Elections and Bylaws

In Coughlan v Minister for the Cabinet Office (2020) EWCA 723 the Court of Appeal upholds the dismissal of a challenge to the lawfulness of a pilot scheme to require voters in certain local authority areas to produce identification documentation as a pre-condition to obtain a ballot paper to enable them to vote. The scheme was under Section 10(2)(a) of the Representation of the People Act 2000. This was a permissible restriction, not on the right to vote, but on “how” voting is to take place. “How” is a broad and general concept and covers an experimental scheme requiring identification at the polling station to demonstrate that entitlement.

 

Allocation Policy

June 8th, 2020 by James Goudie KC in Housing

In R (Flores) v Southwark LBC (2020) EWHC 1279 (Admin) the Court interprets the Council’s priority housing scheme in the context of overcrowding and the meaning of “ deliberate act”.

 

Charitable Trust

June 8th, 2020 by James Goudie KC in Land, Goods and Services

Brent LBC v Johnson (2020) EWHC 933(Ch) holds that an argument that a local authority is not free to sell a property that it owns because it is held on charitable trust for the local community can be advanced only in proceedings to which the Attorney General is party.

 

PFI Contracts and Services

June 5th, 2020 by James Goudie KC in Decision making and Contracts

PFI contracts are starting to expire. Managing their end will be complex and time and resources intensive. Decisions will have to be made on whether services should then be provided in-house or by a contractor. Early preparations are needed.

The National Audit Office has produced a Report, “ Managing PFI assets and services as contracts end”. It examines the risks to assets and services, the preventative steps to be considered, and the preparation and delivery of contract expiry.

 

Flexible Tenancies

June 4th, 2020 by James Goudie KC in Housing

Secure tenancies granted by local housing authorities are either the familiar periodic tenancies or tenancies for a fixed term. Croydon LBC v Kalonga (2020) EWHC 1353(QB) concerns a flexible secure tenancy granted by the Council for a fixed term of 5 years.

Read more »

 

Public Path in Public Park

June 3rd, 2020 by James Goudie KC in Environment, Highways and Leisure

In Barlow v Wigan MBC (2020) EWCA Civ 696 the Court of Appeal holds that a public path in a local authority park engaged the statutory duty under Section 41 of the Highways Act 1980 notwithstanding that the path had not been constructed as a highway by the authority in its capacity as highway authority. The path was nonetheless maintainable at public expense within Section 36 of the Act. It had been dedicated as a highway.

 

Listed Buildings

May 21st, 2020 by James Goudie KC in Planning and Environmental

An item being on a listed building list is not conclusive of it being a “ building”. When considering what free standing items, such as garden objects or structures, qualify as a “ building” protected in the listed building context the relevant criteria are (1) size, (2) permanence, and (3) degree of physical attachment. So held by the Supreme Court in Dill v SoS for MHCLG (2020’ UKSC 20.

 

Rateable Occupation

May 21st, 2020 by James Goudie KC in Council Tax and Rates

ATMs installed inside and outside supermarkets and shops are not separate hereditament. They remain in the rateable occupation of the retailers, not of the parties which operate them. So has the Supreme Court held in Cardtronics v Sykes (2020) UKSC 21. It is analogous to the situation of a lodging house. There is a single hereditament in the rateable occupation of the landlord.