In every case, when deciding whether an age assessment has been conducted consistent with the requirement of fairness, there is no substitute for testing the matter against the basic principle, by reference to (1) the circumstances of the case under consideration, and (2) whether (a) the decision rested on reasonable investigation and (b) the investigation was undertaken fairly. So emphasized Swift J in HAM v Brent LBC (2022) EWHC 1924 ( Admin ). He added that the investigation requirement is likely to focus on whether any interview with the person was conducted to permit him (i) properly to contribute, and (ii) properly to respond to matters going to his credibility which the local authority considers weigh against his contention to be a child.
Subscribe
Get an email when we publish a new post on this blog. We'll never share your email and you can unsubscribe any time. Our use of your details is explained in our privacy policy.
Headings
- Best Value (13)
- Capital Finance and Companies (54)
- Council Tax and Rates (72)
- Decision making and Contracts (259)
- Elections and Bylaws (32)
- Environment, Highways and Leisure (117)
- General (17)
- Housing (143)
- Human Rights and Public Sector Equality Duty (103)
- Judicial Control, Liability and Litigation (212)
- Land, Goods and Services (72)
- Local Authority Powers (73)
- Non Judicial Control (21)
- Planning and Environmental (147)
- Social Care (72)
- Standards (22)
Disclaimer
This blog is maintained for information purposes only. It is not intended to be a source of legal advice and must not be relied upon as such. Blog posts reflect the views and opinions of their individual authors, not of chambers as a whole.
Comments are closed.
11KBW, 11 King’s Bench Walk, Temple, London EC4Y 7EQ | Tel: 020 7632 8500
Privacy | Terms & Conditions | © 11KBW 2024
Privacy | Terms & Conditions | © 11KBW 2024