R ( HUDA AMMORI ) v SSHD (2026) EWHC 292 ( Admin0 is a successful challenge to the decision by the SSHD to proscribe Palestine Action. The grounds of challenge included ECHR rights, specifically Article 10, freedom of expression with respect to which there was very significant interference ( paras 106. 135 & 140), Article 11, freedom of association, with respect to which there was very significant experience, paras 105, 135 & 140, and Article 14. What needed to be justified (para 109) was the restriction on action comprising PEACEFUL PROTEST.
Subscribe
Get an email when we publish a new post on this blog. We’ll never share your email and you can unsubscribe any time. Our use of your details is explained in our privacy policy.
"*" indicates required fields
Headings
- Best Value (13)
- Capital Finance and Companies (60)
- Council Tax and Rates (87)
- Decision making and Contracts (291)
- Elections and Bylaws (36)
- Environment, Highways and Leisure (133)
- General (20)
- Housing (165)
- Human Rights and Public Sector Equality Duty (123)
- Judicial Control, Liability and Litigation (252)
- Land, Goods and Services (83)
- Local Authority Powers (75)
- Non Judicial Control (21)
- Planning and Environmental (191)
- Social Care (85)
- Standards (26)
Disclaimer
This blog is maintained for information purposes only. It is not intended to be a source of legal advice and must not be relied upon as such. Blog posts reflect the views and opinions of their individual authors, not of chambers as a whole.
11KBW, 11 King’s Bench Walk, Temple, London EC4Y 7EQ | Tel: 020 7632 8500 | © 11KBW 2026