INVESTVIEW LTD v TANDRIDGE DC (2025) UKUT 405 (LC) concerns the regulation of HMOs under the Housing Act 2004, PROHIBITION ORDERS imposed in response to what the Council regarded as a number of HAZARDS, including INADEQUATE SPACE, relevant SPACE STANDARDS, and the risk posed for occupants. The Court analysed the legal regimes in relation to the SIZE OF RESIDENTIAL ACCOMMODATION. These are (1) Planning : paras 5-7; (2) Statutory Overcrowding under the Housing Act 1985 : paras 8 & 9; (3) the Housing Health and safety rating System , under Part 1 of the 2004 Act and 2005 regulations : paras 10-12; and (4) the Decent Homes Standard : para 13.
Subscribe
Get an email when we publish a new post on this blog. We’ll never share your email and you can unsubscribe any time. Our use of your details is explained in our privacy policy.
"*" indicates required fields
Headings
- Best Value (13)
- Capital Finance and Companies (59)
- Council Tax and Rates (83)
- Decision making and Contracts (289)
- Elections and Bylaws (34)
- Environment, Highways and Leisure (128)
- General (17)
- Housing (163)
- Human Rights and Public Sector Equality Duty (120)
- Judicial Control, Liability and Litigation (245)
- Land, Goods and Services (83)
- Local Authority Powers (75)
- Non Judicial Control (21)
- Planning and Environmental (189)
- Social Care (85)
- Standards (26)
Disclaimer
This blog is maintained for information purposes only. It is not intended to be a source of legal advice and must not be relied upon as such. Blog posts reflect the views and opinions of their individual authors, not of chambers as a whole.
Comments are closed.
11KBW, 11 King’s Bench Walk, Temple, London EC4Y 7EQ | Tel: 020 7632 8500 | © 11KBW 2025